The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has issued its final report on the helicopter crash that killed Herbert Wigwe, former CEO of Access Holdings Plc, his family, and others.
The report attributed the crash, which killed Wigwe, his wife Doreen, their son Chizi, and ex-NGX Group chairman Abimbola Ogunbanjo, to pilot disorientation and operator negligence.
The accident happened on February 9, 2024, near Californiaโs Nevada border, killing all six aboard the helicopter (registered N130CZ).
Investigators concluded the main cause was the pilotโs choice to proceed under visual flight rules (VFR) despite entering instrument meteorological conditions (IMC).
This decision caused spatial disorientation, leading to loss of control and the fatal crash.
The NTSB stated the pilot likely suffered spatial disorientation, a loss of directional sense due to poor visibility, resulting in the aircraftโs uncontrolled descent.
The report emphasized that the pilotโs inability to navigate effectively in these conditions was a significant factor in the fatal accident.
In addition to the pilotโs decision, the report also cited severe deficiencies in the companyโs oversight and safety management processes.
The NTSB found that the helicopter company failed to ensure pilots followed essential safety procedures, including the accurate completion and updating of flight risk assessments and the proper logging of maintenance discrepancies.
Further details from the report revealed that during the flight, the pilot had communicated with the companyโs Director of Maintenance (DOM) about an issue with the radar altimeter, which remained non-functional despite attempts to fix it.
The NTSB also revealed that after arriving at the airport to pick up the passengers, the pilot and a company flight follower engaged in a phone conversation but failed to discuss the status of the radar altimeter or the current weather conditions, both of which could have impacted the flightโs safety.
The report said: โThe probable cause of this accident was the pilotโs decision to continue the flight into IMC, which led to spatial disorientation and the loss of control of the aircraft.
โContributing factors include the companyโs inadequate oversight of safety management, failure to ensure proper documentation, and the non-functioning radar altimeter.
โDuring the return flight, the pilot texted the director of maintenance (DOM) about the issue. After arriving at the companyโs flight operations base, the pilot discussed the issue with the company flight follower (who was also the companyโs president).
โA company mechanic performed some troubleshooting on the radar altimeter; however, he was unable to rectify the issue, and the radar altimeter remained non-functional.
โThe mechanic reported that the pilot and the DOM were aware that the radar altimeter was not functioning, yet they departed at 1822 on the positioning flight to pick up the passengers.
โAbout 40 minutes later, the positioning flight landed at the airport to pick up the charter passengers. After arrival, the pilot and flight follower had a phone conversation and exchanged text messages, but they did not discuss the status of the radar altimeter or weather conditions.โ
Discussion about this post