NBA Condemns Misuse of Police Powers as Tony Elumelu Social Media Arrests Spark National Debate on Free Speech
Nigeria’s legal community has formally weighed into the growing controversy surrounding the arrest of several social media users linked to alleged defamatory publications against billionaire businessman and Chairman of United Bank for Africa (UBA), Tony Elumelu, with the National Executive Council (NEC) of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) condemning what it described as the dangerous misuse of criminal law enforcement in civil disputes.
The controversy, which has dominated Nigerian social media over the past week, began after viral posts circulated online alleging that Elumelu had separated from his wife. The claims spread rapidly across X, Facebook, TikTok and blogs, generating widespread reactions before UBA publicly denied the reports and announced that arrests had been made in connection with the publications.
In an official statement signed by UBA’s Group Head of Marketing and Corporate Communications, Alero Ladipo, the bank described the allegations as “false, malicious and defamatory,” insisting they were deliberately designed to damage the reputation of the businessman, his family and the institution.
UBA further confirmed that arrests had been carried out by security agencies and identified some of the suspects as Kingsley Akunemeihe, popularly known online as @Directorkem, Chigozie Success Ihebom and John Surpruchi Nwanorue, also known as @problemchimky.
The bank warned that investigations were still ongoing and stated that more individuals involved in originating, reposting or amplifying the claims could face legal consequences.
The statement immediately triggered a national debate on whether police authorities should be involved in matters relating to online expression and reputational disputes, especially where no direct criminal offence had been publicly established.
While some Nigerians defended Elumelu and the arrests, arguing that social media users should not be allowed to spread false information without consequences, others insisted that defamation matters are fundamentally civil disputes that should be addressed through lawsuits rather than arrests and detention.
The matter became even more heated after activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore publicly criticized the arrests.
In a lengthy post on X, Sowore argued that no Nigerian should be detained simply because a wealthy or influential individual felt offended by online commentary.
“This is why no one should be arrested on the orders or influence of @UBAgroup Chair @TonyOElumelu,” Sowore wrote.
“He is a public figure, and a billionaire content creator and the Nigeria Police Force @policeng has no right to detain anyone on his behalf over expression.”
Sowore argued that globally recognized public figures are routinely subjected to criticism, satire and public scrutiny without resorting to police action against citizens.
Referencing figures such as Elon Musk, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and Tony Blair, the activist maintained that criticism and public commentary are part of democratic culture.
“Across the world, public figures are scrutinized and criticized, sometimes harshly,” Sowore wrote, while also citing the case of a teenager who tracked Elon Musk’s private jet online for years without being arrested.
He further stated that the use of police influence in defamation disputes reflects deeper systemic problems in Nigeria’s justice system.
“Only in Nigeria would a billionaire public figure attempt to use a compromised police system to detain other content creators for expressing unflattering views,” he added.
“Freedom of expression is not a crime.”
Sowore’s comments immediately drew sharp responses online, especially from controversial social media influencer VeryDarkMan, who publicly attacked the activist over his position.
In a viral video post that further intensified tensions online, VeryDarkMan described Sowore as someone who “fight for everything and therefore fight for nothing,” while accusing him of defending irresponsible social media behavior.
The influencer’s caption, which contained derogatory remarks directed at Sowore, quickly generated thousands of reactions, with Nigerians splitting into opposing camps.
Supporters of the arrests argued that wealth or status should not exempt anyone from seeking legal protection against false accusations capable of destroying reputations, businesses and families.
Others, however, insisted that while defamatory statements may attract consequences, involving the police in such disputes amounts to intimidation and abuse of state power.
The debate continued to escalate until the Nigerian Bar Association formally intervened on Thursday during its NEC meeting held in Awka, Anambra State.
In what many legal observers now describe as one of the strongest institutional condemnations of the arrests so far, the NBA issued a detailed resolution warning against the criminalisation of disputes that are essentially civil in nature.
According to the full statement released after the meeting, the association said:
“The National Executive Council (NEC) of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), at its meeting held on Thursday, 7 May 2026 in Awka, Anambra State, adopted a resolution condemning the increasing misuse of criminal law enforcement mechanisms in disputes fundamentally civil in nature, particularly matters relating to defamation and reputational injury.”
The association specifically referenced the controversy involving Elumelu and the arrested social media users.
“NEC considered recent reports involving the arrest of individuals over a viral social media publication concerning businessman Mr. Tony Elumelu and expressed concern over the growing tendency to deploy police powers in matters that ought properly to be resolved through civil legal processes.”
The NBA acknowledged that individuals who believe they have been defamed are entitled to legal remedies, but emphasized that such remedies already exist within Nigeria’s civil justice framework.
“The Council emphasized that while false and defamatory publications may give rise to legal consequences, civil remedies such as defamation proceedings provide lawful and adequate avenues for redress without resort to arrest, detention, or criminal prosecution.”
Legal experts say this section of the NBA’s statement directly challenges the increasing trend of petitioning law enforcement agencies over online publications, particularly under cybercrime-related provisions.
The association further warned that using criminal law mechanisms in disputes centered around speech and reputation poses serious constitutional risks.
“NEC warned that the criminalisation of essentially civil disputes undermines constitutional safeguards, including the rights to personal liberty, freedom of expression, and fair hearing.”
The NBA also noted that beyond individual arrests, the broader consequence could be a culture of fear capable of discouraging public conversation and civic engagement.
“The Council further noted that the abuse of police powers in civil disputes risks creating a chilling effect on lawful expression and public discourse.”
Observers say this concern reflects growing fears among journalists, bloggers, activists and ordinary citizens who increasingly worry that social media commentary could expose them to arrests even in matters traditionally handled through civil litigation.
The association therefore called directly on Nigerian law enforcement agencies to show restraint and professionalism.
“NEC therefore called on law enforcement agencies to exercise restraint and ensure that criminal processes are not improperly invoked in matters that do not disclose recognised criminal offences under Nigerian law.”
In perhaps the most significant portion of the statement, the NBA demanded the immediate release of any individual being detained solely over such publications where no recognizable criminal offence exists.
“The Council also demanded the immediate release of any person arrested solely in connection with such publications where no lawful criminal offence has been disclosed.”
The NBA’s intervention has since shifted the conversation beyond Tony Elumelu or the arrested individuals themselves into a wider national debate about democracy, police powers, online speech and the limits of reputational protection in Nigeria’s digital age.
Across social media, many Nigerians have continued to question whether influential individuals enjoy disproportionate access to state power, while others insist that unchecked misinformation online has become dangerous and must carry consequences.
The controversy also revives longstanding criticisms surrounding the application of Nigeria’s cybercrime laws, which rights groups have repeatedly argued are sometimes used to silence dissent, intimidate journalists and suppress criticism.
As public reactions continue to pour in, legal analysts say the NBA’s position may place additional pressure on security agencies to justify the legal basis for the arrests and determine whether the matter ultimately belongs in a criminal courtroom or a civil defamation suit.
For now, the arrests remain one of the country’s most talked-about social media controversies, exposing the increasingly tense relationship between wealth, influence, online speech and law enforcement in contemporary Nigeria.
Discussion about this post